A public comment period regarding proposed
clarification in Class II gaming definitions as deemed by the National Indian
Gaming Commission (NIGC) in the U.S. will be coming to a close on November 15,
2006. Public comments on a corresponding economic impact study are also being
taken by the NIGC until December 15, 2006. Stemming from a decision by the NIGC
to propose new regulation standards that would serve to classify gaming devices
in tribal casinos covered under the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, the public
comment periods are a chance for individuals to voice their opinions.
This is precisely what several Indian tribes from
Montana recently did when they held a rare meeting with the NIGC to voice their
concerns that the new regulations would hinder their casino operations, and that
overall, Montana tribes have been feeling neglected by the NIGC. However, as far
as the NIGC is concerned, their primary mission is to regulate tribal casino
gaming in the U.S. in a way that fosters the betterment of each tribes welfare
in compliance with gambling laws of the state in which the tribe resides.
This is precisely the source of the NIGC's concern
and motivation for a need to clarify between Class II and III gaming devices.
Under the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, Class II gaming devices do not require
tribes to make compacts with each state governing the usage of these devices,
which include bingo and similar casino games. Class III games, on the other
hand, require tribes to negotiate compacts with each state regarding their
usage, and consist of slot machines and similar devices.
The NIGC has been worried for some time now that
many games currently classified as Class II gaming devices should actually be
classified as Class III, and that in order to draw a more distinct line between
the two these so-called Class II games should be changed so that it takes more
time for players to play them, thereby reducing the amount of money being spent
on them in a given time frame. Tribal casinos across the board are not happy
about this whatsoever since they will obviously be taking in less revenue. Some
tribes are claiming that by passing these new regulations, they will not be able
to successfully operate profitable casinos.