The Missouri Gaming Commission denied a proposal
this week that was calling for an amendment to the State's lifetime casino
self-banning legislation. The proposal was calling for the enforcement of
lifetime bans to be significantly shortened to two-year bans, which after having
elapsed, gamblers could apply to be taken off of the ban and resume gambling at
Missouri casinos.
No details were released on the specifics of why
the proposal was rejected or whether the Gaming Commission gave reasons for its
decision; However, it is suspected that the proposal will come up again in the
near future (probably as a modified version) considering a smaller, less
official meeting of the Commission voted 2 to 1 in favor of the proposal.
Missouri was the first State in
the U.S. to pass an ordinance allowing problem gamblers to put themselves on a
lifetime self-exclusion list. First passed in 1996, the list is now compiled of
over 10,000 Missouri residents who have willingly placed themselves on it, which
if they are caught violating, can be prosecuted for trespassing and forced to
forfeit gambling jackpots taken into their possession.
The National Council on Problem
Gambling did not make any open statements regarding the movement to modify the
casino exclusion ban. The Council is known for supporting these lifetime
banishment lists, which after Missouri became to first to put into action,
several other U.S. States have followed suit. However, what the council
primarily advocates is rehabilitation, treatment and education regarding problem
gambling addictions, which is precisely the angle that the proposal to change
the ban is willing to take.
The question being asked now is
that if problem gamblers can prove and show to the Missouri Gaming Commission
they have been treated for their addiction in a two-year cool down period, will
that suffice to remove their names from the list and permit them to gamble once
again at Missouri casinos.